zlacker

[return to "xAI joins SpaceX"]
1. eduard+tq[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:31:30
>>g-mork+(OP)
From the Big Short (movie)

Jared Vennett (narration): "In the years that followed, hundreds of bankers and rating agency's executives went to jail. The SEC was completely overhauled, and Congress had no choice but to break up the big banks and regulate the mortgage and derivatives industries."

"Just kidding. Banks took the money the American people gave them, and they used it to pay themselves huge bonuses, and lobby the Congress to kill big reform. And then they blamed immigrants and poor people, and this time even teachers."

◧◩
2. Fogest+Ku[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:50:47
>>eduard+tq
I feel like without adding some commentary with these quotes this comment lacks enough info to see how it relates to the linked article.
◧◩◪
3. crysta+pw[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:58:09
>>Fogest+Ku
Because this move is entirely financial engineering to hide losses just like the roll up of X in to xAI.

None of this has anything to do with business or innovation. Do you not immediately see that? Most of my friends reaction to this news was that this is so obvious it's almost funny (or actually it is funny, since most were laughing as they read the headline).

I'm curious how you could not understand the relevance of the quote unless you were aggressively trying to not understanding it.

◧◩◪◨
4. Fogest+PK[view] [source] 2026-02-03 01:29:22
>>crysta+pw
But that is also just an assumption isn't it? Could this not also be related to the fact that they plan to launch a ton of servers into the sky to run in space and power AI? It would mean that their AI product would become heavily based on the services provided by SpaceX via launching all this.

But regardless, I think quotes like these should have some commentary around them as it helps create a discussion around whatever point they might be trying to make rather than having to make assumptions.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. overfe+mO[view] [source] 2026-02-03 01:53:48
>>Fogest+PK
> Could this not also be related to the fact that they plan to launch a ton of servers into the sky to run in space and power AI

FWIW, SpaceX launched a Tesla roadster into space without first having to merge with Tesla.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Fogest+dP[view] [source] 2026-02-03 01:58:04
>>overfe+mO
That's a very disingenuous argument and you know it. Starlink is under SpaceX. Do you also think that is wrong then too? They are effectively doing the same kind of thing.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. overfe+o21[view] [source] 2026-02-03 03:39:06
>>Fogest+dP
> Starlink is under SpaceX

Kuiper is not under Blue Origin, and there are no whispers of Amazon and BO merging. You're the one being disingenuous in suggesting that companies have to be merged to buy services from - or cooperate with - each other.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. Fogest+4d1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 05:19:01
>>overfe+o21
That's not what I said. Please stop using these kinds of disingenuous attacks.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. overfe+1F1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 09:16:04
>>Fogest+4d1
Being combative and wrong would be an unfortunate combination. Combative, wrong and ignoring counterexamples that disprove your assertions and hurling ad hominems puts you firmly in troll territory. Good day.
[go to top]