zlacker

>>g-mork+(OP)
SpaceX is too big to fail. It's important for national security.

I wonder if Elon wants to tangle all his businesses into SpaceX so they are all kept afloat by SpaceX's importance.

>>Button+C4
I think he will spin Tesla off since electrification and autonomy are no longer cool (he can’t build good quality cars or reliable FSD)

>>garyfi+r9
FSD is incredibly reliable. Build quality of US built cars is middle of the pack, Europe/China built Teslas are top of the pack.

>>iknows+dp
Oh c'mon now. Damn model 3 and model S I have driven were considerably lower quality interiors than an ass end Citroen or Fiat. The Model S, a 2023 model the doors didn't even fit properly. And that was all Europe.

As for FSD, nope. Unless you redefine the word reliable.

Edit: I owned a 2018 Model S as well. Literally the worst fucking car I have ever owned or driven.

>>dgxyz+iq
I disagree. Model 3 has soft touch everywhere. Freaking bmw 3 series has plastic on most frequently touched bits.

Since you are in europe you have no idea how good fsd is.

>>iknows+ws
BMW actually has a reasonable control surface though, not a grand user interface experiment by some crack heads.

As I'm in Europe I just get trains.

>>dgxyz+Js
> BMW actually has a reasonable control surface though, not a grand user interface experiment by some crack heads.

Really? It's one thing to hate Elon Musk, but you're talking about a lot of brilliant engineers who worked on these cars, everything from the components to the software. It's uneeded low blow just because you don't like Elon Musk.

>>gianca+fz
Looking at cyber truck I can’t help but disagree with you. Absolutely questionable design choices. From top to bottom.