zlacker

[return to "Why software stocks are getting pummelled"]
1. latefo+G02[view] [source] 2026-02-02 19:39:18
>>peteth+(OP)
> The fear is that these [AI] tools are allowing companies to create much of the software they need themselves.

AI-generated code still requires software engineers to build, test, debug, deploy, secure, monitor, be on-call, support, handle incidents, and so on. That's very expensive. It is much cheaper to pay a small monthly fee to a SaaS company.

◧◩
2. tossan+a82[view] [source] 2026-02-02 20:08:55
>>latefo+G02
That would justify a good multiple of 5 to 10. Not 30 or above as for high growth companies.
◧◩◪
3. louier+vm2[view] [source] 2026-02-02 21:13:21
>>tossan+a82
multiple of what? there is maybe one software company trading above 30x revenue - palantir. many companies growing at 20% trade at single digit revenue multiples.
◧◩◪◨
4. jmalic+MV2[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:30:54
>>louier+vm2
Unqualified it almost always means earnings (profits).
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. louier+X03[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:54:20
>>jmalic+MV2
that is really not the case in software, people commonly go between EV/S and EV/FCF for high growth names. also earnings could mean: GAAP earnings, non-GAAP earnings, ebitda, ebita, FCF, FCF ex share based comp.
[go to top]