zlacker

[return to "Zig Libc"]
1. jzelin+eW[view] [source] 2026-02-02 21:54:56
>>ingve+(OP)
Cool idea, for sure, but I can't help but wonder: for the code that's been ported, is there a concern that you'd have to perpetually watch out for CVEs in glibc/musl and determine if they also apply to the Zig implementations?
◧◩
2. AndyKe+ek1[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:24:33
>>jzelin+eW
Yes but we already have to do that for our own standard library. For shared codepaths (e.g. math) it's strictly fewer potential bugs.
[go to top]