zlacker

[return to "The largest number representable in 64 bits"]
1. bmacho+Ml[view] [source] 2026-02-02 20:13:14
>>tromp+(OP)
Can you give a formulation of the problem you are trying to answer?
◧◩
2. tromp+Vm[view] [source] 2026-02-02 20:19:16
>>bmacho+Ml
To find the largest number that is computable by a program of at most 64 bits in a non-cheating language; i.e. one that's not geared toward producing large numbers.
◧◩◪
3. bmacho+Vp[view] [source] 2026-02-02 20:30:52
>>tromp+Vm
Do you have a mathematical formulation, or?

Ultimately you seem to pick a random definition of computing and size and then work with that?

◧◩◪◨
4. SAI_Pe+K41[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:13:58
>>bmacho+Vp
"Computable" has a well-known standard definition in this context, meaning a computable function[1]. In a given model of computation, a computable function is one for which an algorithm exists which computes the value of the function for every value of its argument. For example, the successor function adds 1 to an input number, and is computable. The halting problem (determine whether a program given in the argument halts) is not computable.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computable_function

[go to top]