zlacker

[return to "The largest number representable in 64 bits"]
1. tromp+oz[view] [source] 2026-02-02 21:14:38
>>tromp+(OP)
Please no more comments to the extent of "i can define a much larger number in only 1 bit". What makes my blog post (hopefully) interesting is that I consider tiny programs for computing huge numbers in non-cheating languages, that are not specifically equipped for doing so.
◧◩
2. orlp+kL[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:03:29
>>tromp+oz
An interesting follow-up question is, what is the smallest number unable to be encoded in 64 bits of binary lambda calculus?
[go to top]