zlacker

[return to "Notepad++ hijacked by state-sponsored actors"]
1. simlev+S1[view] [source] 2026-02-02 02:18:44
>>myster+(OP)
Probably related to this: https://notepad-plus-plus.org/news/v869-about-taiwan/
◧◩
2. icelan+72[view] [source] 2026-02-02 02:21:13
>>simlev+S1
Yeah, Notepad++ is known for political messaging in their updates. Taiwan, Ukraine, etc.
◧◩◪
3. lobito+N2[view] [source] 2026-02-02 02:27:28
>>icelan+72
Probably the real motive.
◧◩◪◨
4. chvid+Fb[view] [source] 2026-02-02 04:05:03
>>lobito+N2
“ The incident began from June 2025. Multiple independaent security researchers have assessed that the threat acotor is likely a Chinese state-sponsored group, which would explain the highly selective targeting obseved during the campaign.”

How do they know it was a Chinese group or even a state sponsored one?

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. cwnyth+df[view] [source] 2026-02-02 04:43:23
>>chvid+Fb
They said "likely", so they don't "know." Yours is the wrong question.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. skeled+qc1[view] [source] 2026-02-02 14:05:03
>>cwnyth+df
The "likely" does give the impression that they have a pretty good idea.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. cwnyth+ey2[view] [source] 2026-02-02 20:52:09
>>skeled+qc1
I didn't say that to be pedantic, but to avoid that particular type of asker who isn't actually asking a genuine question here. After listing all the ways that Notepad++ (as an example here) suspects who they suspect, the asker then comes back with "Yeah, but how do you know?", as if that's some sort of gotcha. It's disingenuous. Even if the person I replied to isn't attempting this, I find it good to call out and get people to ask a better question: what's the evidence and why does that evidence point to this conclusion?
[go to top]