zlacker

[return to "Linux From Scratch ends SysVinit support"]
1. antony+Qc[view] [source] 2026-02-02 18:46:15
>>cf100c+(OP)
All I want is init scripts and X11, but the horizons are shrinking. I've already compromised with systemd, and I don't like it. I see BSD in my future, or at least a linux distro from the list here https://nosystemd.org/ - probably Gentoo. Nothing to stop me, absolutely nothing at all. I just need a few days free to backup/wipe/reinstall/reconfigure/restore_data and I'll be good. Better make that a few weeks. Maybe on my next machine build. It's not easy, but I build machines for long term use.

As for Linux from Scratch - This is something that's been on my radar, but without the part I'm truly interested in (learning more about SysV) then I'm less inclined to bother. I don't buy the reason of Gnome/KDE - isn't LfS all about the basics of the distro than building a fully fledged system? If it's the foundation for the other courses, but it still feels weak that it's so guided by a future GUI requirement for systemd when it's talking about building web servers and the like in a 500Mb or less as the motivation.

◧◩
2. cmrdpo+qd[view] [source] 2026-02-02 18:49:56
>>antony+Qc
Almost wonder if this kind of thing will be an impetus for GNU Hurd to get more momentum. I saw an update recently that they're now finally properly supporting 64bit and sounds like there's active dev going on there again.

It apparently uses SysVInit

◧◩◪
3. antony+ie[view] [source] 2026-02-02 18:54:39
>>cmrdpo+qd
I've heard of Hurd, but never felt tempted to try it. That could be an interesting option.
◧◩◪◨
4. raggi+Yg[view] [source] 2026-02-02 19:07:40
>>antony+ie
hurd init is a lot like systemd architecturally, it just gets to use kernel provided ipc rather than having to manage its own. if your objection to systemd is its architecture you don't want anything to do with hurd.
[go to top]