zlacker

>>rebane+(OP)
This is a very neat idea. I am not sure why the page needs to load 40mb of data and make me wait 5 mins before the first view. I'd probably also add some ranking criteria to surface good quality articles that maximize the "I learnt something new today" factor. Overall kudos to the developer for original thinking.

>>abhina+ph
Presumably the 40mb of data is not from Wikipedia, but the Javascript tracking code bundle needed to turn it into a doomscrollable social media feed. ;) By those standards, I think it’s pretty lightweight! For comparison, the Instagram iOS app is 468.9mb, more than ten times the size…

>>rwl+QJ
40mb is way too much for a JS bundle... Even with a framework you could do this with 5mb or less.

>>isquei+BN
> you could do this with 5mb or less

How quick the times change... Back in my days, we put the limit on bundles being maximum 1MB, and it felt large even then.

>>embedd+iV
Don't get me wrong. 5mb is a lot for this, yes. This app, coded with love and interest could easily be made under 1mb.

>>isquei+GV
This app IS made in under 1mb. The entire app, including all the assets minus all the actual Wikipedia data, is 21kB (no minification or compression). And all of it is in a single html file with human-readable code.

>>rebane+r01
Interesting. I haven't investigated, so I don't know where the 40mb comes from.