zlacker

[return to "A Crisis comes to Wordle: Reusing old words"]
1. hombre+Mf[view] [source] 2026-02-01 20:03:48
>>cyanba+(OP)
1. Wordle's word list is going to be a lot more curated than TFA's word list because people want to guess words they use or have heard of, not "aahed".

2. Only a tiny group of people care to "card count" Wordle to rule out words that have already been played because they think that sort of min/maxing is fun. Most people don't even think about that, so whether Wordle reuses words every few years is trivial to them.

◧◩
2. thauma+6Q[view] [source] 2026-02-02 01:03:02
>>hombre+Mf
> people want to guess words they use or have heard of, not "aahed"

That isn't a correct diagnosis; people have heard of aahed. You'll find it naturally in the expression "[someone] oohed and aahed".

People don't want aahed, and their instinct that it shouldn't count is reasonable, but unfamiliarity isn't the problem with it.

◧◩◪
3. zarzav+bU[view] [source] 2026-02-02 01:41:59
>>thauma+6Q
Ooh and aah aren't words, they're sounds (onomatopoeia). A sound is just a sequence of letters used for their phonological values.

You can spell the sound "ah" however you like: ah, ahh, aah, aahh, there's no wrong way to spell it.

If you write "the washing machine tringged when it finished", 'tring' is not a word, even though it's following the rules of English morphology, you could have written any sequence of letters that most faithfully reproduces the sound of the washing machine. You could have written katrigged or puh-tringged.

◧◩◪◨
4. paulco+A91[view] [source] 2026-02-02 04:20:39
>>zarzav+bU
Ooh and aah most certainly are words. Is meow not a word? Can I spell it miough and sit smugly correct?
[go to top]