zlacker

[return to "Towards a science of scaling agent systems: When and why agent systems work"]
1. verdve+eb[view] [source] 2026-02-01 19:32:42
>>gmays+(OP)
gonna read this with a grain of salt because I have been rather unimpressed with Google's Ai products, save direct API calls to gemini

The rest is trash they are forcing down our throats

◧◩
2. 4b11b4+9c[view] [source] 2026-02-01 19:40:34
>>verdve+eb
Yeah alpha go and zero were lame. The earth foundation model - that's just ridiculous.

That's sarcasm

---

Your "direct Gemini calls" is maybe the least impressive

edit: This paper is mostly a sort of "quantitative survey". Nothing to get too excited about requiring a grain of salt

◧◩◪
3. verdve+be[view] [source] 2026-02-01 19:55:57
>>4b11b4+9c
The underlying models are impressive, be it Gemini (via direct API calls, vs the app or search), I would include alpha-go/fold/etc in that classification

The products they build, where the agentic stuff is, is what I find unimpressive. The quality is low, the UX is bad, they are forced into every product. Two notable examples, search in GCloud, gemini-cli, antigravity (not theirs technically, $2B whitelabel deal with windsurf iirc)

So yes, I see it as perfectly acceptable to be more skeptical of Google's take on agentic systems when I find their real world applications lackluster

[go to top]