zlacker

[return to "Claude Code is your customer"]
1. gjsman+Ntg[view] [source] 2026-01-31 20:57:01
>>mfbx9d+(OP)
I'm going to say an unpopular opinion here: I think agents are going to turn out mostly useless, even if they worked almost perfectly.

How many jobs involve purely clicking things on a computer without human authorities, rules, regulations, permits, spending agreements, privacy laws, security requirements, insurance requirements, or licensing gates?

I wager, almost none. The bottleneck in most work isn't "clicking things on a computer." It's human judgment, authorization chains, regulatory gates, accountability requirements, and spending approvals. Agents automate the easy part and leave the hard part untouched. Meanwhile, if the agents also get it wrong, even 1% of the time, that's going to add up like compound interest in wasted time. Anything that could actually be outsourced to an agent, would have already been outsourced to Kenya.

◧◩
2. pitche+Pvg[view] [source] 2026-01-31 21:10:16
>>gjsman+Ntg
These AI agents have been such a burden to open source projects that maintainers are beginning to not take patches from anyone. That follows from what you’re saying here because it’s the editing/review part that’s human-centric. Same with the approval gates mentioned here.

Another parallel here is that AI agents will probably end up being poor customers in the sense of repeat business and long-term relationships. Like how some shops won’t advertise on some platforms because the clicks aren’t worth as much, on average, maybe we’ll start to see something similar for agents.

[go to top]