zlacker

>>swolpe+(OP)
To me it looks like some of the more “interesting” posts are created by humans. It’s a pointless experiment, I don’t understand why would anyone find it interesting what statistical models are randomly writing in response to other random writings.

>>pllbnk+oF
I think the level at which someone is impressed by AI chatbot conversation may be correlated with their real-world conversation experience/ skills. If you don’t really talk to real people much (a sadly common occurrence) then an LLM can seem very impressive and deep.

>>keifer+wG
I'd argue that talking a lot with real people is a stronger predictor of finding conversations with a chatbot meaningful.