zlacker

[return to "OpenClaw – Moltbot Renamed Again"]
1. bob102+pb[view] [source] 2026-01-30 07:26:37
>>ed+(OP)
I would have stood my ground on the first name longer. Make these legal teams do some actual work to prove they are serious. Wait until you have no other option. A polite request is just that. You can happily ignore these.

The 2nd name change is just inexcusable. It's hard to take a project seriously when a random asshole on Twitter can provoke a name change like this. Leads me to believe that identity is more important than purpose.

◧◩
2. kube-s+tc[view] [source] 2026-01-30 07:36:49
>>bob102+pb
As the article says, it’s a 2 month old weekend project. It’s doing a lot better than my two month old weekend projects.
◧◩◪
3. superf+jh[view] [source] 2026-01-30 08:20:49
>>kube-s+tc
While weekend project may be correct, I think it gives a slightly wrong impression of where this came from. Peter Steinberger is the creator who created and sold PSPDFKit, so he never has to work again. I'm listening to a podcast he was on right now and he talks about staying up all night working on projects just because he's hooked. According to him made 6,600 commits in January alone. I get the impression that he puts more time into his weekend project than most of us put into our jobs.

That's not to diminish anything he's done because frankly, it's really fucking impressive, but I think weekend project gives the impression of like 5 hours a week and I don't think that's accurate for this project.

◧◩◪◨
4. sudden+Zi[view] [source] 2026-01-30 08:38:24
>>superf+jh
Number of commits doesn't mean much.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. superf+2n[view] [source] 2026-01-30 09:15:27
>>sudden+Zi
I get what you're saying, but I don't totally agree. The number is sooo high that, while it isn't a perfect measure, I think it does mean something.

If you go look at his code, nearly all of them are under 100 lines and I'd say close to half are under 10. So you're totally right that that number is way higher than what most other developers would have for a similar amount of code. At the same time, if we assume it takes 30 seconds to make a commit on average that's still 55 hours in a month, that is way above what most would call a weekend project.

My point wasn't really that number of commits is some perfect measure of developer productivity. It was just that if you're actually building something and not just generating commits for the hell of it, there's a minimum amount of time needed for each commit. 6600 times whatever that minimum time is is probably more than what most people would think of for a weekend project.

[go to top]