zlacker

>>simonw+(OP)
Seems like everyone is trying to get ahead of tool calling moving people "off platform" and creating differentiators around what tools are available "locally" to the models etc. This also takes the wind out of the sandboxing folks, as it probably won't be long before the "local" tool calling can effectively do anything you'd need to do on your local machine.

I wonder when they'll start offering virtual, persistent dev environments...

>>candid+Bj
> I wonder when they'll start offering virtual, persistent dev environments...

A lot of companies have been wanting to move in this direction. Instead of maintaining a fleet of machines, you just get a bunch of thin clients and pay Microsoft of whoever to host the actual workloads. They already do this 'kiosk' style stuff for a lot of front-line staff.

Honestly, not having my own local hardware for development sounds like a living hell, but seems like the way we are going.

>>yoyohe+wm
Coding agents are a particularly good fit for disposable development environments because of the risk of them messing things up. If the entire environment is ephemeral the worst that can happen (aside from private source code leaks to a malicious third party) is the environment gets trashed and you have to start over in a new one.

>>simonw+fp
Not ephemeral, but similar idea to keep things isolated in LXC containers. Disclosure, my project.

https://github.com/jgbrwn/vibebin