zlacker

>>samwil+(OP)
"To test this system, we pointed it at an ambitious goal: building a web browser from scratch."

I shared my LLM predictions last week, and one of them was that by 2029 "Someone will build a new browser using mainly AI-assisted coding and it won’t even be a surprise" https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jan/8/llm-predictions-for-202... and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVDhQMiAbR8&t=3913s

This project from Cursor is the second attempt I've seen at this now! The other is this one: https://www.reddit.com/r/Anthropic/comments/1q4xfm0/over_chr...

>>simonw+35
2029? I have no idea why you would think this is so far off. More like Q2 2026.

>>cheevl+q6
You're either overestimating the capabilities of current AI models or underestimating the complexity of building a web browser. There are tons of tiny edge cases and standards to comply with where implementing one standard will break 3 others if not done carefully. AI can't do that right now.

>>xmprt+W8
Even though several people seconded the complexity of a browser, I must add one more take and bring up one of my all time favorite blog posts, back from 2000 (I am old), when browsers were already complex, Joel Spolsky's Joel On Software episode "Things You Should Never Do, Part I" https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/04/06/things-you-should-... His first example was Netscape browser v6.0, and why there wasn't a v5.0 after v4.0, why it took three years: "They did it by making the single worst strategic mistake that any software company can make: They decided to rewrite the code from scratch." I think this blog post is very relevant here.