zlacker

>>oceans+(OP)
IANAA: what legal powers does the city/state have to expel ICE agents? Especially as they are operating in, at best, increasingly shady legality.

I always understood that the USA is built on a delicate balance of power between the federal and state governments. But here the federal government is sending thugs who, masked or unmasked, are brazenly killing people in bizzare circumstances. And the best the state can do is PTFO?

>>rich_s+bc
Make it illegal to enable any commercial transactions within the state supporting federal agents. No food sales, no fuel sales, no hotel stays, no medical care, no rental cars. Make them drag their supply chain in like the Middle East.

In state economic deplatforming.

>>toomuc+Fh
Make it illegal to enable any commercial transactions within the state supporting federal agents. No food sales, no fuel sales, no hotel stays, no medical care, no rental cars. Make them drag their supply chain in like the Middle East.

In state economic deplatforming.

You're gonna prosecute Minnesotans for accepting cash?

>>maxeri+2j
No, its prosecution for supporting terrorists.

>>xboxno+Vk
Some guy comes into your restaurant and eats a meal. Pays cash. Leaves. He was ICE. You're now subject to charges from the state of Minnesota?

That sounds like maybe not entirely the best idea.

>>maxeri+Px
If only the courts has some experience arbitrating intent and negligence.

You've truly found a loophole.

>>cosmic+d81
My point is that the OPs goal of preventing transactions with federal employees is impractical, so I'm not sure what you want me to say here.

>>maxeri+Ra1
You could talk about the goal of drastically diminishing transactions with federal employees.