zlacker

>>mefeng+(OP)
See x thread for rationale: https://x.com/mitchellh/status/2014433315261124760?s=46&t=FU...

“ Ultimately, I want to see full session transcripts, but we don't have enough tool support for that broadly.”

I have a side project, git-prompt-story to attach Claude Vode session in GitHub git notes. Though it is not that simple to do automatic (e.g. i need to redact credentials).

>>jakoza+68
I've thought about saving my prompts along with project development and even done it by hand a few times, but eventually I realized I don't really get much value from doing so. Are there good reasons to do it?

>>radars+s8
It's not for you. It's so others can see how you arrived to the code that was generated. They can learn better prompting for themselves from it, and also how you think. They can see which cases got considered, or not. All sorts of good stuff that would be helpful for reviewing giant PRs.

>>fragme+g9
Sounds depressing. First you deal with massive PRs and now also these agent prompts. Soon enough there won't be any coding at all, it seems. Just doomscrolling through massive prompt files and diffs in hopes of understanding what is going on.

>>Ronsen+Vd
I suspect this future will not play out. Mitchell is definitely leaning to one side on this debate.

To me, quality code is quality code no matter how it was arrived at. That should be the end of it