zlacker

[return to "I was banned from Claude for scaffolding a Claude.md file?"]
1. bastar+Dj[view] [source] 2026-01-22 20:15:27
>>hugoda+(OP)
I've been doing something a lot like this, using a claude-desktop instance attached to my personal mcp server to spawn claude-code worker nodes for things, and for a month or two now it's been working great using the main desktop chat as a project manager of sorts. I even started paying for MAX plan as I've been using it effectively to write software now (I am NOT a developer).

Lately it's gotten entirely flaky, where chat's will just stop working, simply ignoring new prompots, and otherwise go unresponsive. I wondered if maybe I'm pissing them off somehow like the author of this article did.

Now even worse is Claude seemingly has no real support channel. You get their AI bot, and that's about it. Eventually it will offer to put you through to a human, and then tell you that don't wait for them, they'll contact you via email. That email never comes after several attempts.

I'm assuming at this point any real support is all smoke and mirrors, meaning I'm paying for a service now that has become almost unusable, with absolutely NO means of support to fix it. I guess for all the cool tech, customer support is something they have not figured out.

I love Claude as it's an amazing tool, but when it starts to implode on itself that you actually require some out-of-box support, there is NONE to be had. Grok seems the only real alternative, and over my dead body would I use anything from "him".

◧◩
2. syntax+Ek[view] [source] 2026-01-22 20:23:17
>>bastar+Dj
Serious question, why is codex and mistral(vibe) not a real alternative?
◧◩◪
3. deaux+a81[view] [source] 2026-01-23 02:47:10
>>syntax+Ek
Codex: Three reasons. I've used all extensively, for multiple months.

Main one is that it's ~3 times slower. This is the real dealbreaker, not quality. I can guarantee that if tomorrow we woke up and gpt-5.2-codex became the same speed as 4.5-opus without a change in quality, a huge number of people - not HNers but everyone price sensitive - would switch to Codex because it's so much cheaper per usage.

The second one is that it's a little worse at using tools, though 5.2-codex is pretty good at it.

The third is that its knowledge cutoff is further in the past than both Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3 that it's noticeable and annoying when you're working with more recent libraries. This is irrelevant if you're not using those.

For Gemini 3 Pro, it's the same first two reasons as Codex, though the tool calling gap is even much bigger.

Mistral is of course so far removed in quality that it's apples to oranges.

◧◩◪◨
4. EnPiss+cL1[view] [source] 2026-01-23 08:54:48
>>deaux+a81
Have you tried lower reasoning levels?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. deaux+JO1[view] [source] 2026-01-23 09:28:21
>>EnPiss+cL1
Yes and this makes it faster, but still quite a bit slower than Claude Code, and the tool use gap remains. Especially since the comparison for e.g. 5.2 Codex-Low is more like Sonnet than Opus, so that's the speed you're competing with.
[go to top]