zlacker

[return to "Recent discoveries on the acquisition of the highest levels of human performance"]
1. Kitten+Li[view] [source] 2026-01-22 19:29:25
>>colinc+(OP)
This sort of tracks for me. The smartest people I know as adults mostly fucked around a lot and had wide interests that all culminated in them doing a great thing greatly. The smartest people I know as kids spent hours grinding on something and crashed out in college and are mostly average well-to-dos now.
◧◩
2. bitwiz+iw[view] [source] 2026-01-22 20:40:14
>>Kitten+Li
I'm reminded of a meme on Facebook my wife showed me that was a two-dimensional graph of SAT score vs. GPA. The corner with the highest SAT scores but the lowest GPAs was shaded in and labelled "These are the people I want to hang out with."
◧◩◪
3. tayo42+yD[view] [source] 2026-01-22 21:24:55
>>bitwiz+iw
What does the reverse imply? High GPA, low SAT?
◧◩◪◨
4. irishc+MJ[view] [source] 2026-01-22 22:00:36
>>tayo42+yD
Probably the stupid-and-diligent bit.

> In 1933, while overseeing the writing of Truppenführung, the manual for leading combined arms formations, Hammerstein-Equord made one of the most historically prescient observations on leadership. During the writing effort, he offered his personal view of officers, classifying them in a way only he could:

> “I divide my officers into four groups. There are clever, diligent, stupid, and lazy officers. Usually two characteristics are combined. Some are clever and diligent — their place is the General Staff. The next lot are stupid and lazy — they make up 90% of every army and are suited to routine duties. Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership duties, because he possesses the intellectual clarity and the composure necessary for difficult decisions. One must beware of anyone who is stupid and diligent — he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always cause only mischief.”

https://news.clearancejobs.com/2019/10/08/the-four-classes-o...

[go to top]