zlacker

>>hugoda+(OP)
I am really confused as to what happened here. The use of ‘disabled organization’ to refer to the author made it extra confusing.

I think I kind of have an idea what the author was doing, but not really.

>>cortes+w7
You're not alone.

I think the author was doing some sort of circular prompt injection between two instances of Claude? The author claims "I'm just scaffolding a project" but that doesn't appear to be the case, or what resulted in the ban...

>>alista+h8
Author really comes off unhinged throughout the article to be frank.

>>lazyfa+Ta
Did we read the same article? The author comes of as pretty frustrated but not unhinged

>>superb+rb
I wouldn't say "unhinged" either, but maybe just struggling to organize and express thoughts clearly in writing. "Organizations of late capitalism, unite"?

>>ryandr+4h
The author was frustrated that the error message identified him as an organisation (that was disabled) and mockingly refers to himself as the (disabled) organisation in the post.

At least, that’s my reading but it appears it confuses about half of the commenters here.

>>Bootvi+Os
I think if one's readers need an "ironic euphemism decoder glossary" just to understand the message, it could use a little re-writing.

>>ryandr+aw
It was perfectly understandable to me. Maybe cultural differences? You seem to be American, OP Portuguese, and myself European as well.