zlacker

>>xmrcat+(OP)
The first thing I have to point out is that this entire article is clearly LLM-generated from start to finish.

The second thing I have to point out is that bug bounty programs are inundated with garbage from people who don't know anything about programming and just blindly trust whatever the LLM says. We even have the 'author' reproducing this blind reinforcement in the article: "Tested Jan 2026. Confirmed working."

The third thing I have to point out is that the response from Valve is not actually shown. We, the reader, are treated to an LLM-generated paraphrasal of something they may or may not have actually said.

Is it possible this issue is real and that Valve responded the way they did? Perhaps, but the article alone leaves me extremely skeptical based on past experiences with LLM-generated bug bounty reports.

>>anonym+96
>The first thing I have to point out is that this entire article is clearly LLM-generated from start to finish.

Is your LLM detector on a hairtrigger? At best the headings seem like LLM, but the rest don't look LLM generated.

>>gruez+s7
It does for me too. Especially the short parts with headings, the bold sentences in their own paragraph and especially formulations like "X isn't just... it's Y".

>>tim-kt+F7
In other words, this website uses headings for sections, doesn't ramble, and has a single line of emphasis where you'd expect it. I wonder what style we'll have to adopt soon to avoid LLM witchhunt - live stream of consciousness ranting with transcript and typos?

>>virapt+Cc
"In other words" means paraphrasing, not simply changing the words to something completely different.