zlacker

>>Scramb+(OP)
as i already wrote in an other comment. Where are the millions lines of code needed to train LLM in this Nanolang? LLM are like parrots. if you dont give them data to extract the statistic probability of the next word, you will not get any usefull output. LLM do not think, they can't learn without training data

>>Surac+Wa1
That's an incorrect assumption. You can get quite far with some skill documents and some examples in combination with tools to compile and run your code. The LLM will train itself on the fly based on the feedback from these tools.