zlacker

>>Scramb+(OP)
It seems that something that does away with human friendly syntax and leans more towards a pure AST representation would be even better? Basically a Lisp but with very strict typing might do the trick. And most LLMs are probably trained on lots of Lisps already.

>>abraxa+dh
Generally seems a bad idea to have your LLM write languages you do not understand or write yourself

>>verdve+bv
Doesn’t that apply to the OP as well?

>>catlif+0z
Yes, I'm not going to fill my precious context with documentation for a programming language

This seems like a research dead end to me, the fundamentals are not there