zlacker

>>drewgr+(OP)
I think people's focus on the threat model from AI corps is wrong. They are not going to "steal your precious SSH/cloud/git credentials" so they can secretly poke through your secret-sauce, botnet your servers or piggy back off your infrastructure, lol of lols. Similarly the possibility of this happening from MCP tool integrations is overblown.

This dangerous misinterpretation of the actual possible threats simply better conceals real risks. What might those real risks be? That is the question. Might they include more subtle forms of nastiness, if anything at all?

I'm of the belief that there will be no nastiness, not really. But if you believe they will be nasty, it at least pays to be rational about the ways in which that might occur, no?

>>keepam+48i
The risk isn't from the AI labs. It's from malicious attackers who sneak instructions to coding agents that cause them to steal your data, including your environment variable secrets - or cause them to perform destructive or otherwise harmful actions using the permissions that you've granted to them.

>>simonw+Wbi
Simon, I know you're the AI bigwig but I'm not sure that's correct. I know that's the "story" (but maybe just where the AI labs would prefer we look?). How realistic is it really that MCP/tools/web search is being corrupted by people to steal prompts/convos like this? I really think this is such low prop. And if it does happen, the flaw is the AI labs for letting something like this occur.

Respect for your writing, but I feel you and many others have the risk calculus here backwards.

>>keepam+uKi
Every six months I predict that "in the next six months there will be a headline-grabbing example of someone pulling off a prompt injection attack that causes real economic damage", and every six months it fails to happen.

That doesn't mean the risk isn't there - it means malicious actors have not yet started exploiting it.

Johann Rehberger calls this effect "The Normalization of Deviance in AI", borrowing terminology from the 1986 Space Shuttle Challenger disaster report: https://embracethered.com/blog/posts/2025/the-normalization-...

Short version: the longer a company or community gets away with behaving in an unsafe way without feeling the consequences, the more they are likely to ignore those risks.

I'm certain that's what is happening to us all today with coding agents. I use them in an unsafe way myself.