zlacker

[return to ""]
1. mrweas+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-13 16:50:11
I loved Dilbert, having worked for more than one Dilbert-like company the humor frequently resonated with me.

How or why Scott Adams went completely of the rails is perhaps something we'll sadly never understand. Was this opinions he'd always had, but suppressed, did he somehow become radicalized or was it perhaps medically induced, e.g. a stroke or something. It was incredibly sad to see him throw away his life's work and go down a path most of us at least hadn't foreseen and die having alienated his fans.

2. riazri+lf[view] [source] 2026-01-13 17:38:49
>>mrweas+(OP)
Did he go off the rails? My understanding is that the zeitgeist is taking people’s opposing views online and distorting them, removing context, to outrage our own audience and align it to our cause.

Almost everyone is reasonable, it’s the contexts that our reasons are relevant to, which are different.

◧◩
3. dangus+it[view] [source] 2026-01-13 18:26:44
>>riazri+lf
“The best advice I would give to white people is to get the hell away from black people“ -Scott Adams

Does that sound reasonable to you?

◧◩◪
4. ljspra+ay1[view] [source] 2026-01-13 22:54:17
>>dangus+it
It's hyperbole and in response to black people who don't think it's OK to be white.
◧◩◪◨
5. dangus+yz1[view] [source] 2026-01-13 23:01:33
>>ljspra+ay1
This is once again misunderstood.

People are correctly pointing out that the phrase “it’s okay to be white” is used as a dogwhistle.

They are not literally saying that it’s not okay to be white. They’re saying that those who speak that phrase are projecting their racist ideology. People who say “it’s okay to be white” think that white people are under attack and that white people need to re-establish dominance. To them, equality is a threat.

◧◩◪◨⬒
6. Planks+Uc2[view] [source] 2026-01-14 03:46:39
>>dangus+yz1
> think that white people are under attack

Yes, they think that.

> and that white people need to re-establish dominance. To them, equality is a threat

No. When a specific group is singled out and attacked, whether they’re white, black, or brown, man or woman, that can not be a basis for equality.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. dangus+qp3[view] [source] 2026-01-14 14:53:03
>>Planks+Uc2
Of course now we are getting into the persecution fetish. The entire premise of white people in America facing any kind of race-based setback is laughable.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
8. Planks+Wif[view] [source] 2026-01-17 21:44:41
>>dangus+qp3
American political parties have revolved around platforming persecution fetishes for decades now. Real struggles are inevitably exploited by individuals who leverage identity politics for their personal gain. This has played out in every group who currently or historically suffered some injustice, I don’t need to list them all, and now we can include whites on that list.

But it’s not up for debate that white college applicants, particularly from poor and middle-class backgrounds, were discriminated against by top universities who implemented race-based admissions policies. The numbers are public. There’s simply no question.

[go to top]