zlacker

[return to "Cursor's latest “browser experiment” implied success without evidence"]
1. josefr+lq[view] [source] 2026-01-16 16:39:47
>>embedd+(OP)
Key phrase "They never actually claim this browser is working and functional " This is what most AI "successes" turn out to be when you apply even a modicum of scrutiny.
◧◩
2. hexbin+nD[view] [source] 2026-01-16 17:38:16
>>josefr+lq
No you see you just need to prompt it to implement functional and working code. You're just inexperienced and holding it wrong
◧◩◪
3. fallou+ZE[view] [source] 2026-01-16 17:45:48
>>hexbin+nD
$200/month tool (real cost could be $1000/month), but you have to babysit it.
◧◩◪◨
4. hexbin+SC1[view] [source] 2026-01-16 22:25:04
>>fallou+ZE
Yes that's completely expected. Just like any other tool or service.

It's just like a chisel. Well the chisel company didn't promise to let you become a master craftsman overnight but anyway it's just like a chisel in that you have to learn how to use it. And people expect a chisel to actually chisel through wood out the box but anyway it's exactly like a chisel.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. fallou+yQ2[view] [source] 2026-01-17 13:00:58
>>hexbin+SC1
chisel works exactly as advertised but Claude thinks I can use it to cure cancer by Tuesday.
[go to top]