zlacker

[return to "Cursor's latest “browser experiment” implied success without evidence"]
1. pavlov+j91[view] [source] 2026-01-16 19:45:33
>>embedd+(OP)
The comment that points out that this week-long experiment produced nothing more than a non-functional wrapper for Servo (an existing Rust browser) should be at the top:

>>46649046

◧◩
2. pera+gl1[view] [source] 2026-01-16 20:41:47
>>pavlov+j91
Has anyone tried to rewrite some popular open source project with IA? I imagine modern LLMs can be very effective at license-washing/plagiarizing dependencies, it could be an interesting new benchmark too
◧◩◪
3. gorkae+Xv1[view] [source] 2026-01-16 21:40:52
>>pera+gl1
I think it's fair enough to consider porting a subset of rewriting, in which case there are several successful experiments out there:

- JustHTML [1], which in practice [2] is a port of html5ever [3] to Python.

- justjshtml, which is a port of JustHTML to JavaScript :D [4].

- MiniJinja [5] was recently ported to Go [6].

All three projects have one thing in common: comprehensive test suites which were used to guardrail and guide AI.

References:

1. https://github.com/EmilStenstrom/justhtml

2. https://friendlybit.com/python/writing-justhtml-with-coding-...

3. https://github.com/servo/html5ever

4. https://simonwillison.net/2025/Dec/15/porting-justhtml/

5. https://github.com/mitsuhiko/minijinja

6. https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/1/14/minijinja-go-port/

◧◩◪◨
4. EmilSt+oQ1[view] [source] 2026-01-17 00:05:52
>>gorkae+Xv1
As the author, it's a stretch to say that JustHTML is a port of html5ever. While you're right that this was part of the initial prompt, the code is very different, which is typically not what counts as "port". Your mileage may wary.
[go to top]