zlacker

>>embedd+(OP)
Key phrase "They never actually claim this browser is working and functional " This is what most AI "successes" turn out to be when you apply even a modicum of scrutiny.

>>josefr+lq
In my personal experience, Codex and Claude Code are definitively capable tools when used in certain ways.

What Cursor did with their blogpost seems intentionally and outright misleading, since I'm not able to even run the thing. With Codex/Claude Codex it's relatively easy to download it and run it to try for yourself.

>>embedd+ws
"definitively capable tools when used in certain ways". This sounds like "if it doesn't work for you is because you don't use in the right way" imo.

Reminds me of SAAP/Salesforce.

>>netdev+gw
> "definitively capable tools when used in certain ways". This sounds like "if it doesn't work for you is because you don't use in the right way" imo.

Yes, because that's what it is. If you seriously can't get Gemini 3 or Opus 4.5 to work you're either using it wrong or coding on something extremely esoteric.