zlacker

[return to "Cursor's latest “browser experiment” implied success without evidence"]
1. paulus+0w[view] [source] 2026-01-16 17:04:21
>>embedd+(OP)
The blog[0] is worded rather conservatively but on Twitter [2] the claim is pretty obvious and the hype effect is achieved [2]

CEO stated "We built a browser with GPT-5.2 in Cursor"

instead of

"by dividing agents into planners and workers we managed to get them busy for weeks creating thousands of commits to the main branch, resolving merge conflicts along the way. The repo is 1M+ lines of code but the code does not work (yet)"

[0] https://cursor.com/blog/scaling-agents

[1] https://x.com/kimmonismus/status/2011776630440558799

[2] https://x.com/mntruell/status/2011562190286045552

[3]https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1qd541a/ceo_of...

◧◩
2. embedd+pw[view] [source] 2026-01-16 17:06:12
>>paulus+0w
So clearly someone, at some point, managed to run this, surely? That's where the screenshots come from? I just don't understand how, given the code is riddled with errors.
◧◩◪
3. nicobu+e51[view] [source] 2026-01-16 19:28:17
>>embedd+pw
Somebody managed to get it to compile https://x.com/CanadaHonk/status/2011612084719796272

But apparently "some pages take a literal minute to load"

[go to top]