zlacker

[return to "Cursor's latest “browser experiment” implied success without evidence"]
1. josefr+lq[view] [source] 2026-01-16 16:39:47
>>embedd+(OP)
Key phrase "They never actually claim this browser is working and functional " This is what most AI "successes" turn out to be when you apply even a modicum of scrutiny.
◧◩
2. embedd+ws[view] [source] 2026-01-16 16:50:05
>>josefr+lq
In my personal experience, Codex and Claude Code are definitively capable tools when used in certain ways.

What Cursor did with their blogpost seems intentionally and outright misleading, since I'm not able to even run the thing. With Codex/Claude Codex it's relatively easy to download it and run it to try for yourself.

[go to top]