zlacker

[return to "The Palantir app helping ICE raids in Minneapolis"]
1. oxqbld+28[view] [source] 2026-01-15 15:28:50
>>fajmcc+(OP)
And ppl were worried about China's 1984 style use of Ai, lol. In the end it was greedy software developers that enable this.
◧◩
2. stackg+Z9[view] [source] 2026-01-15 15:34:56
>>oxqbld+28
This is what happens when one allows oneself to hide in "safe spaces" (like HN) where there's a "no politics" rule enabling people to hide and avoid being confronted with the ramifications of their actions.

The entire world runs on technology now. It's all inherently political.

◧◩◪
3. bright+oo[view] [source] 2026-01-15 16:22:04
>>stackg+Z9
I'm going to defend the HN "no politics" rule here.

The reason "no politics" zones exist is because there are enough people going out of their way to shout at everybody, everywhere, in every corner of the internet and enough people are tired of it that they flock to...no politics zones. In real life, a person like that confronts you...you remove yourself from the situation, because that person who can't stop shouting at everybody comes across as nuts.

◧◩◪◨
4. andoan+Bz[view] [source] 2026-01-15 17:02:34
>>bright+oo
Same, you wouldn't criticize a woodworking forum for not having politics.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. stackg+PA[view] [source] 2026-01-15 17:07:33
>>andoan+Bz
I would, if people on that woodworking forum did critical work for DOGE, or Palantir, or Facebook, or Sam Altman.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. andoan+CK[view] [source] 2026-01-15 17:42:45
>>stackg+PA
Most of us don't work at those places.

And besides, what does discussing technology itself have anything to do with it? If you work at big tech you're not allowed to particpate in tech forum as a hobby?

We already discuss politics here as it has to do with tech (privacy is a pretty common topic here for example).

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. stackg+sM[view] [source] 2026-01-15 17:51:07
>>andoan+CK
>Most of us don't work at those places.

Right, but we should be able to shame, ostracize, and criticize the people that do work at those places because if we don't then it's a tacit approval of what they do.

You know that saying about how if you have three people sharing a bench with a Nazi, you actually have four Nazis? Tech has social and political ramifications, the discussion of which is artificially suppressed on HN.

Most of the time you can't do that here. Try saying something negative about Sam Altman, for example. dang has certain topics he just won't permit and then hides behind the excuse of "if everyone is upset with you, you must be doing something right".

>If you work at big tech you're not allowed to particpate in tech forum as a hobby?

I don't understand what you mean, can you please clarify?

[go to top]