zlacker

>>LucidL+(OP)
Doesn't the existence of consumer products like ChatGPT indicate that LLMs aren't able to do human-level work? If OpenAI really had a digital workforce with the capabilities of ~100k programmers/scientists/writers/lawyers/doctors etc, wouldn't the most profitable move be to utilize those "workers" directly, rather that renting out their skills piecemeal?

>>caditi+Qe
For now it's better and easier to do this with our money and our feedback.

But yes, someone else said that as soon as any of these get to AGI you will not be able to use it.

>>glemio+aA1
To be more exact, the fact that everyone sells access to models they are continually "improving" is proof that any statement from the LLM peddlers about AGI is a lie.