zlacker

[return to "The Influentists: AI hype without proof"]
1. sleeke+H9[view] [source] 2026-01-14 21:28:36
>>LucidL+(OP)
I agree, if the benefits are so large, there should be clearer evidence (that isn't, "trust me, just use it").

That said, I use Antigravity with great success for self hosted software. I should publish it.

Why haven't I?

* The software is pretty specific to my requirements.

* Antigravity did the vast amount of work, it feels unworthy?

* I don't really want a project, but that shouldn't really stop me pushing to a public repo.

* I'm a bit hesitant to "out" myself?

Nonetheless, even though I'm not the person, I'm surprised there isn't more evidence out there.

◧◩
2. expens+gp[view] [source] 2026-01-14 22:31:55
>>sleeke+H9
> Antigravity did the vast amount of work, it feels unworthy

I think this is true for me as well. I have two types of projects that I’ve been working on - small ones with a mix of code I wrote and AI. I have posted these, as I spent a lot of time guiding the AI, cleaning up the AI’s output, and I think the overall project has value that others can learn from and built on.

But I also have some that are almost 100% vibe-coded. First, those would take a lot of time to clean up and write documentation for to make them publishable/useful.

But also, I do think they feel “unworthy”. Even though I think they can be helpful, and I was looking for open-source versions of those things. But how valuable can it really be if I was able to vibe-code it in a few prompts? The next person looking for it will probably do the same thing I did and vibe-code their own version after a few minutes.

[go to top]