zlacker

[return to "The Influentists: AI hype without proof"]
1. pizzat+ua[view] [source] 2026-01-14 21:32:39
>>LucidL+(OP)
My anxiety about falling behind with AI plummeted after I realized many of these tweets are overblown in this way. I use AI every day, how is everyone getting more spectacular results than me? Turns out: they exaggerate.

Here are several real stories I dug into:

"My brick-and-mortar business wouldn't even exist without AI" --> meant they used Claude to help them search for lawyers in their local area and summarize permits they needed

"I'm now doing the work of 10 product managers" --> actually meant they create draft PRD's. Did not mention firing 10 PMs

"I launched an entire product line this weekend" --> meant they created a website with a sign up, and it shows them a single javascript page, no customers

"I wrote a novel while I made coffee this morning" --> used a ChatGPT agent to make a messy mediocre PDF

◧◩
2. browni+Sb[view] [source] 2026-01-14 21:37:51
>>pizzat+ua
Getting viral on X is the current replacement for selling courses for {daytrading,amazon FBA,crypto}.

The content of the tweets isn't the thing.. bull-posting or invoking Cunningham's Law is. X is the destination for formula posting and some of those blue checkmarks are getting "reach" rev share kickbacks.

◧◩◪
3. AznHis+6p[view] [source] 2026-01-14 22:31:08
>>browni+Sb
Same with Linkedin. Ive seen a lot of posts telling u to comment something to get a secret guide on how to do Y.

If it was successful, they wouldnt be telling everyone about it

[go to top]