zlacker

[return to "The Influentists: AI hype without proof"]
1. pizzat+ua[view] [source] 2026-01-14 21:32:39
>>LucidL+(OP)
My anxiety about falling behind with AI plummeted after I realized many of these tweets are overblown in this way. I use AI every day, how is everyone getting more spectacular results than me? Turns out: they exaggerate.

Here are several real stories I dug into:

"My brick-and-mortar business wouldn't even exist without AI" --> meant they used Claude to help them search for lawyers in their local area and summarize permits they needed

"I'm now doing the work of 10 product managers" --> actually meant they create draft PRD's. Did not mention firing 10 PMs

"I launched an entire product line this weekend" --> meant they created a website with a sign up, and it shows them a single javascript page, no customers

"I wrote a novel while I made coffee this morning" --> used a ChatGPT agent to make a messy mediocre PDF

◧◩
2. gianca+Mj[view] [source] 2026-01-14 22:09:44
>>pizzat+ua
> "I wrote a novel while I made coffee this morning" --> used a ChatGPT agent to make a messy mediocre PDF

There was a story years ago about someone who made hundreds of novels on Amazon, in aggregate they pulled in a decent penny. I wonder if someone's doing the same but with ChatGPT instead.

◧◩◪
3. bogwog+Tk[view] [source] 2026-01-14 22:14:55
>>gianca+Mj
Afaik, I think the way people are making money in this space is selling courses that teach you how to sell mass produced AI slop on Amazon, rather than actually doing it
[go to top]