zlacker

[return to "The Influentists: AI hype without proof"]
1. minima+mc[view] [source] 2026-01-14 21:40:04
>>LucidL+(OP)
There are two major reasons people don't show proof about the impact of agentic coding:

1) The prompts/pipelines portain to proprietary IP that may or may not be allowed to be shown publically.

2) The prompts/pipelines are boring and/or embarrassing and showing them will dispel the myth that agentic coding is this mysterious magical process and open the people up to dunking.

For example in the case of #2, I recently published the prompts I used to create a terminal MIDI mixer (https://github.com/minimaxir/miditui/blob/main/agent_notes/P...) in the interest of transparency, but those prompts correctly indicate that I barely had an idea how MIDI mixing works and in hindsight I was surprised I didn't get harrassed for it. Given the contentious climate, I'm uncertain how often I will be open-sourcing my prompts going forward.

◧◩
2. deng+Pd[view] [source] 2026-01-14 21:44:56
>>minima+mc
No. The main reasons are that

1) the code AI produces is full of problems, and if you show it, people will make fun of you, or

2) if you actually run the code as a service people can use, you'll immediately get hacked by people to prove that the code is full of problems.

◧◩◪
3. dugidu+si[view] [source] 2026-01-14 22:03:16
>>deng+Pd
How are both of these not simply the second case they provided?
[go to top]