zlacker

>>LucidL+(OP)
I agree, if the benefits are so large, there should be clearer evidence (that isn't, "trust me, just use it").

That said, I use Antigravity with great success for self hosted software. I should publish it.

Why haven't I?

* The software is pretty specific to my requirements.

* Antigravity did the vast amount of work, it feels unworthy?

* I don't really want a project, but that shouldn't really stop me pushing to a public repo.

* I'm a bit hesitant to "out" myself?

Nonetheless, even though I'm not the person, I'm surprised there isn't more evidence out there.

>>sleeke+H9
I think this "* The software is pretty specific to my requirements." is the biggest part for me. I built something with Antigravity over the holidays that I can use for myself and it solves my use case. I tried thinking about if this can be helpful for others and pushed it a bit further into a version that could be hosted. Which does not make that much sense because it is a computationally intense numerical solver for thermal bridges and just awfully slow on a free hosted platform. But the project was a couple of evenings and would otherwise haven taken me half a year to complete (and thus never been done).

https://github.com/schoenenbach/thermal-bridge https://thermal-bridge.streamlit.app/