zlacker

[return to "Scott Adams has died"]
1. mrweas+C2[view] [source] 2026-01-13 16:50:11
>>schmuc+(OP)
I loved Dilbert, having worked for more than one Dilbert-like company the humor frequently resonated with me.

How or why Scott Adams went completely of the rails is perhaps something we'll sadly never understand. Was this opinions he'd always had, but suppressed, did he somehow become radicalized or was it perhaps medically induced, e.g. a stroke or something. It was incredibly sad to see him throw away his life's work and go down a path most of us at least hadn't foreseen and die having alienated his fans.

◧◩
2. jakevo+0b[view] [source] 2026-01-13 17:16:20
>>mrweas+C2
I followed his blog back when he started this descent, and I have a theory that it was hill climbing.

He used to blog about pretty innocent stuff; his wife making fun of him for wearing pajama pants in public, behind the scenes on drawing comics, funny business interactions he'd had. But then he started getting taken out of context by various online-only publications, and he'd get a burst of traffic and a bunch of hate mail and then it'd go away. And then he'd get quoted out of context again. I'm not sure if it bothered him, but he started adding preambles to his post, like "hey suchandsuch publication, if you want to take this post out of context, jump to this part right here and skip the rest."

I stopped reading around this point. But later when he came out with his "trump is a persuasion god, just like me, and he is playing 4d chess and will be elected president" schtick, it seemed like the natural conclusion of hill climbing controversy. He couldn't be held accountable for the prediction. After all, he's just a comedian with a background in finance, not a politics guy. But it was a hot take on a hot topic that was trying to press buttons.

I'm sure he figured out before most people that being a newspaper cartoonist was a downward-trending gig, and that he'd never fully transition to online. But I'm sad that this was how he decided to make the jump to his next act.

◧◩◪
3. mpweih+8q[view] [source] 2026-01-13 18:06:12
>>jakevo+0b
> ...will be elected president

But Trump was elected president. Twice. So maybe Adams was right? Or what did you mean with "hill climbing controversy"?

◧◩◪◨
4. jakevo+4s[view] [source] 2026-01-13 18:13:11
>>mpweih+8q
I should have clarified for people who had the good fortune to not be exposed to these posts, but that was usually his lead-in to his ultra toxic writing. i.e. it was an engaging hook that led to more engaging trolling
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. mpweih+8V[view] [source] 2026-01-13 20:00:06
>>jakevo+4s
Hmm...but people claimed Adams was crazy for saying these things about Trump...and yet Adams was right.

(The same) people also call him crazy (or "toxic") for those other writings. Maybe those other writings were right as well?

Seems at least plausible.

And yeah, I also thought it was completely impossible for Trump to get elected even once. Never mind twice. I was wrong.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. waisbr+Fs1[view] [source] 2026-01-13 22:14:54
>>mpweih+8V
https://gizmodo.com/dilbert-creator-claims-he-taught-chatgpt...

Scott Adams taught ChatGPT to put humans into an instant bliss-state. "Seems at least plausible"?

[go to top]