zlacker

[return to "Nate the Lawyer breaks down the ICE shooting footage in detail [video]"]
1. tim-td+g4[view] [source] 2026-01-13 01:21:40
>>zahlma+(OP)
The driver ran her car into an officer hitting him. Anyone who’s played gta knows a car is a deadly weapon. Pretty sure the officer was justified in using deadly force.
◧◩
2. Quaron+5X[view] [source] 2026-01-13 11:35:29
>>tim-td+g4
He shot while only being a few feet away from the car, which had already started to drive off.

Why would a trained officer believe that shooting at the driver from only a few feet away would have a higher chance of improving his chances against being hit by the car (which was already well in motion), than trying to physically move out of its way? That makes no sense.

◧◩◪
3. zahlma+CI2[view] [source] 2026-01-13 19:32:30
>>Quaron+5X
All of this happened in a split second. As explained in TFA, the relevant legal standards do not require the application of hindsight or sober second thought. They are only concerned with what a reasonable person would do in the circumstances, with the information available in the moment. Training does not and cannot possibly prevent instinctive actions that appear irrational or ineffective after the fact.
◧◩◪◨
4. empath+sV2[view] [source] 2026-01-13 20:19:36
>>zahlma+CI2
How does that boot taste.
[go to top]