zlacker

[return to "CLI agents make self-hosting on a home server easier and fun"]
1. thrown+Os[view] [source] 2026-01-12 00:24:43
>>websku+(OP)
I went down the self host route some years ago but once critical problems hit I realized that beyond a simple NAS it can be a very demanding hobby.

I was in another country when there was a power outage at home. My internet went down, the server restart but couldn't reconnect anymore because the optical network router also had some problems after the power outage. I could ask my folks to restart, and turn on off things but nothing more than that. So I couldn't reach my Nextcloud instance and other stuff. Maybe an uninterruptible power supply could have helped but the more I was thinking about it after just didn't really worth the hassle anymore. Add a UPS okay. But why not add a dual WAN failover router for extra security if the internet goes down again? etc. It's a bottomless pit (like most hobbies tbh)

Also (and that's a me problem maybe) I was using Tailscale but I'm more "paranoid" about it nowadays. Single point of failure service, US-only SSO login (MS, Github, Apple, Google), what if my Apple account gets locked if I redeem a gift card and I can't use Tailscale anymore? I still believe in self hosting but probably I want something even more "self" to the extremes.

◧◩
2. tehlik+Iw[view] [source] 2026-01-12 00:55:06
>>thrown+Os
Starlink backup sounds fun now!
◧◩◪
3. thrown+cx[view] [source] 2026-01-12 00:59:02
>>tehlik+Iw
Way too expensive for that imo (but then again might as well just go all in). Probably a 5G connection is more than enough
◧◩◪◨
4. mlrtim+KX4[view] [source] 2026-01-13 10:57:29
>>thrown+cx
$5/mo is too expensive for starlink backup?
[go to top]