zlacker

>>pcahar+(OP)
(2012) in short they show people protest videos and tell each that the protest is about something different. Depending on their ‘inherent biases’ they answer questions about said protest differently. Ergo a video cannot “speak for itself”

>>bethek+Gl
Is this why the same protest videos can be recycled multiple times for multiple different purposes

>>deadba+Ul
This is also why the era of pervasive videotaping of everything hasn’t ended disputes over basic facts of what happened.

>>rayine+9n
Yes, and now we have billionaires arguing in public about such basic facts:

X link: https://x.com/paulg/status/2008989862725341658

Screenshot: https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1q6zgq5/theres_someth...

>>isx726+bv
The in-progress community notes are a shit show too.

I saw the video and saw someone trying to avoid the ICE agent, but also being EXTREMELY reckless about driving a huge SUV close to people with guns. Everyone is at fault here imo.

>>boxed+jA
For reference since I'm going to assume good faith here, I recommend watching the full videos [1] from multiple angles since there's been multiple edits, cuts and potential changes done if you've seen it elsewhere or on social media. These are the unedited and unmodified videos.

[1] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Gb_IkGVK7WvsTAXfMvQU...

>>fzeror+sB
I've seen them. The issue I think is that if you've got any political opinion before watching, you'll see something different. This thread is literally inside the comments about that!

If you're a total outsider and think both sides in the US sound like absolute crazy people, I would assume you can more easily see the crazy by everyone involved. Or maybe that's just another type of bias? I don't know...