zlacker

[return to "CLI agents make self-hosting on a home server easier and fun"]
1. simonw+g6[view] [source] 2026-01-11 22:01:25
>>websku+(OP)
This posts lists inexpensive home servers, Tailscale and Claude Code as the big unlocks.

I actually think Tailscale may be an even bigger deal here than sysadmin help from Claude Code at al.

The biggest reason I had not to run a home server was security: I'm worried that I might fall behind on updates and end up compromised.

Tailscale dramatically reduces this risk, because I can so easily configure it so my own devices can talk to my home server from anywhere in the world without the risk of exposing any ports on it directly to the internet.

Being able to hit my home server directly from my iPhone via a tailnet no matter where in the world my iPhone might be is really cool.

◧◩
2. drnick+ab[view] [source] 2026-01-11 22:25:31
>>simonw+g6
I'd rather expose a Wireguard port and control my keys than introduce a third party like Tailscale.

I am not sure why people are so afraid of exposing ports. I have dozens of ports open on my server including SMTP, IMAP(S), HTTP(S), various game servers and don't see a problem with that. I can't rule out a vulnerability somewhere but services are containerized and/or run as separate UNIX users. It's the way the Internet is meant to work.

◧◩◪
3. sauerc+Mc[view] [source] 2026-01-11 22:35:11
>>drnick+ab
People are not full time maintainers of their infra though, that's very different to companies.

In many cases they want something that works, not something that requires a complex setup that needs to be well researched and understood.

◧◩◪◨
4. buildf+Jh[view] [source] 2026-01-11 23:05:39
>>sauerc+Mc
Wireguard is _really_ simple in that sense though. If you're not doing anything complicated it's very easy to set up & maintain, and basically just works.

You can also buy quite a few routers now that have it built in, so you literally just tick a checkbox, then scan a QR code/copy a file to each client device, done.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. vladva+dw1[view] [source] 2026-01-12 09:41:42
>>buildf+Jh
This may come with its own limitations, though.

My ISP-provided router (Free, in France) has WG built-in. But other than performance being abysmal, its main pain point is not supporting subnet routing.

So if all you want is to connect your phone / laptop while away to the local home network, it's fine. If you want to run a tunnel between two locations with multiple IPs on the remote side, you're SoL.

[go to top]