zlacker

>>tehnub+(OP)
I have always had concerns about physical robots making my work less safe in the real world.

But had never considered that a programming language might be created thats less human readable/auditable to enable LLMs.

Scares me a bit.

>>protoc+Qj
LLMs in their current form rely heavily on the vast amount of human data that's available, to learn from it as a first step (the second step is RL).

We're not building a language for LLMs just yet.

>>make3+Hq
It's worth asking why we haven't had the AlphaZero moment for general learning yet, where no human data is needed.

>>energy+ux
I think the issue is that for games and other closed-ended systems the criteria are very easy, so self-referential training is effective.