zlacker

>>atestu+(OP)
For all the lunacy of RFK this somehow is actually a really good set of guidelines? Certainly better than the previous version. I didn't expect that to be honest.

>>zeroon+nI
It was a low bar. The previous nutrition guidelines were garbage for generations

>>deflat+tP
And what does it say about traditional governance that it takes a someone like RFK to actually do anything about it.

>>fullsh+rq1
That a majority of your populace not caring about how they're governed is bad for a democratic republic.

>>csoups+9t1
or maybe the nutrition guidelines just don't matter that much.

>>zachth+iw1
That's clearly true, given people by and large know what's good and bad for them but their consumption choices need to factor in a much larger set of pressing constraints like price, availability, and readiness and more abstract constraints like "am I able to be at home with my child and cook for them or do I need to work a second job to make ends meet?" I will not trust a single word from RFK's mouth until he has something to say about food deserts and prices and a plan to do something about it. Until then, he's done the easiest part which bureaucrats specialize in, which is publishing an updated set of guidelines.