zlacker

>>maelit+(OP)
* * *

>>throwf+ya
> Similarly, Musk isn't really better or worse than the other billionaires/trillioners out there.

Gates and Buffet donated millions to public health initiatives. Musk has not. So this is just objectively not true.

>>philip+6b
It's only "objective" if you accept the beneficiaries of those donations as "objectively" benign.

I don't fully agree with the gp's statement - Musk is at least a little worse than most - but Gates in particular is a terrible counter-example. Especially in light of recent document releases.