zlacker

>>tonyme+(OP)
Also a big fan, it is my favorite and only third space. I believe they are fine as is, as someone who has had comment throttling applied, and is not given vouch. Their sandbox, their rules. You can always email to appeal and plead your case. Otherwise, you're giving away trust and safety signal to potential threat actors and people acting in bad faith.

You will either change your behavior improving collective discourse and have privileges restored, not, or learn to operate within the constraints applied without changing (throttled comment posting, etc).

>>toomuc+E
in your case was the throttle cleared without intervention?

I'm not questioning the guidelines, fwiw. It's more about the transparency and making sure people remain engaged.

>>tonyme+eb
I emailed and improved my behavior, and the throttle was cleared. Trust is earned in drops and lost in buckets.

>>toomuc+nd
Same . and I think that part of the policy is healthy. My post is about adding transparency so that users will know when they are banned, without guessing.

>>tonyme+se
If you’re functional enough, you’ll figure it out imho. Think of it as a test or filter of sorts. Can you climb the tree to the treehouse?

>>toomuc+Xp
i agree that is one benefit. but I also don't like spamming the mods with trivial "am I banned" requests.

I may be banned right now. I don't have comment throttle, but I have other indicators.

but I'm not going to bother them with it. It would be nice to manage it on my own.