zlacker

[return to "Why users cannot create Issues directly"]
1. Maxiou+Yb[view] [source] 2026-01-02 03:23:27
>>xpe+(OP)
For example, memory leak investigation is currently spread across discussions, x/twitter and discord https://x.com/mitchellh/status/2004938171038277708 https://x.com/alxfazio/status/2004841392645050601 https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/discussions/10114 https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/discussions/9962

but has not graduated to issue worthy status

◧◩
2. quantu+Jc[view] [source] 2026-01-02 03:33:09
>>Maxiou+Yb
That's a shame to hear. I had to give up on Ghostty because of its memory leak issue. Granted, it was on an 8GB system, but that should be enough to run a terminal without memory exhaustion a few times a week. Foot has been rock solid, even though it lacks some of Ghostty's niceties.
◧◩◪
3. favfla+Uf[view] [source] 2026-01-02 04:09:27
>>quantu+Jc
btw, is it me or is there any justification for anyone including a developer to run more than 8GB of RAM for a laptop? I don't see functionality as having changed in the last 15 years.

For me, only Rust compilation necessitates more RAM. But, I assume devs just do RAM heavy dev work on a server over ssh.

◧◩◪◨
4. tynorf+ug[view] [source] 2026-01-02 04:15:03
>>favfla+Uf
Chrome on my work laptop sits around 20-30GB all day every day.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. typeof+Yg[view] [source] 2026-01-02 04:20:37
>>tynorf+ug
I wonder if having less RAM would compel you to read, commit to long term memory, and then close those 80 tabs you have open.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. magica+bw[view] [source] 2026-01-02 07:23:40
>>typeof+Yg
The issue for me is that bookmarks suck. They don't store the state (where I was reading) and they reload the webpage so I might get something else entirely when I come back. They also kinda just disappear from sight.

If instead bookmarks worked like tab saving does, I would be happy to get rid of a few hundred tabs. Have them save the page and state like the tab saving mechanism does. Have some way to remind me of them after a week or month or so.

Combine that with a search function that can search in contents as well as the title, and I'm changing habbits ASAP.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. banana+qA[view] [source] 2026-01-02 08:14:01
>>magica+bw
Regarding wanting to preserve the current version of a page: I use Karakeep to archive those pages. I am sure there are other similar solutions such as downloading an offline version, but this works well for me.

I do this mostly for blog posts etc I might not get around to reading for weeks or months from now, and don't want them to disappear in the meantime.

Everything else is either a pinned tab (<5) or a bookmark (themselves shared when necessary on e.g a Slack canvas so the whole team has easy access, not just me).

While browsing the rest of my tabs are transient and don't really grow. I even mostly use private browsing for research, and only bookmark (or otherwise save) pages I deem to be of high quality. I might have a private window with multiple tabs for a given task, but it is quickly reduced to the minimum necessary pages and the the whole private window is thrown away once the initial source material gathering is done. This lets me turn off address bar search engines and instead search only saved history and bookmarks.

I often see colleagues with the same many browser windows of many tabs each open struggling to find what they need, and ponder their methods.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. magica+UH[view] [source] 2026-01-02 09:25:47
>>banana+qA
I've started using Karakeep as well, however I don't find its built-in viewer as seamless as a plain browser page. It's also runs afoul of pages which combats bots due to its headless chrome.

Anyway, just strikes me as odd that the browsers have the functionality right there, it's just not used to its full potential.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. banana+rB3[view] [source] 2026-01-03 08:38:00
>>magica+UH
Websites that are walled off behind obscure captcha don't do well in Karakeep for sure, but so far for me those are usually e-commerce sites or sites I don't return to anyway.
[go to top]