zlacker

[return to "Why users cannot create Issues directly"]
1. eviks+zd[view] [source] 2026-01-02 03:39:59
>>xpe+(OP)
> This pattern makes it easier for maintainers or contributors to find issues to work on since every issue is ready to be worked on.

How is this not trivially solved via a "ready-to-be-worked-on" tag?

◧◩
2. mitche+Kp[view] [source] 2026-01-02 06:09:04
>>eviks+zd
Because I don't want my default view to be "triage." If GitHub allowed default issue views (and reflected that in the issue count in the tabs as well), then maybe. But currently, it doesn't work. I've tried it at large project scale across many (multiple projects with more than 20K stars and millions of downloads).

Compared to that, this system has been a huge success. It has its own problems, but it's directionally better.

◧◩◪
3. eviks+Wv1[view] [source] 2026-01-02 16:05:28
>>mitche+Kp
How does different count affect search? You can use a bookmark to change the view, and if using bookmarks is too much, ok, but that's not a bold universal reason.

(also, what is "huge success" in methods of organizing issues?)

bookmark: (and if your browser supports shortcuts, it can be as easy to open as remembering to type a single char)

https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/issues?q=is%3Aissue%2...

[go to top]