zlacker

[return to "Why users cannot create Issues directly"]
1. keyle+U9[view] [source] 2026-01-02 03:03:02
>>xpe+(OP)
Issues simply don't scale. Using discussions as a filter is a good idea.

If you spend more time closing issues than creating them manually from discussions, the math adds up.

◧◩
2. nh2+Se[view] [source] 2026-01-02 03:54:42
>>keyle+U9
What is the actual difference?

As a maintainers, if you want to be be able to tell real issues from non-issue discussions, you still gave to read them (triage). That's what's taking time.

I don't see how transforming a discussion into an issue is less effort than the other way around. Both are a click.

Github's issues and discussions seem the same feature to me (almost identical UI with different naming).

The only potential benefit I can see is that discussions have a top-level upvote count.

◧◩◪
3. oofbey+kf[view] [source] 2026-01-02 04:01:33
>>nh2+Se
If discussions had a more modern UI with threads or something then the difference might be real. But AFAICT it’s the same set of functionality, so it’s effectively equivalent to a tag.
[go to top]